Stop blaming people for choosing bad passwords – it’s time websites di…

Year after year, passwords like “123456”, “qwerty” and already “password” are found to be the most popular choices and 2021 was no exception.

These reports generally come with the same advice to users: create better passwords to protect your security online. Although this is may well be true, it’s also time to realise that years of promoting this message has had little or no effect.

To enhance things, I believe we need to stop blaming people and instead put the onus on websites and sets to encourage and enforce better “cyber hygiene”.

Read more:
Most shared passwords of 2021: here’s what to do if yours makes the list

Of course, it’s easy to point the finger at the users – they’re ultimately the ones making the poor password choices. But at the same time, it’s now well known that people commonly make these choices. So it’s fair to assume that without guidance or restrictions to prevent ineffective passwords, they’re likely to continue with the same habits.

Nonetheless, we have subsequent generations of users who are not told what a good password looks like, nor prevented from making lazy choices. It’s not hard to find examples of websites that will accept the very worst passwords without complaint. It’s similarly easy to find sites that require users to create passwords – in addition give them no guidance in doing so. Or sites that will offer feedback that a user’s password choice is ineffective, but allow it anyway.

How providers can do better

If you’re responsible for running a website or a service that will accept the likes of “123456”, “qwerty” or “password”, it’s time to rethink your system. If you let users get away with bad choices, they will believe that they are permissible and continue this bad practice.

On the contrary, by implementing stronger protocols, you can help to address the problem at its source. Websites should have processes in place to filter out poor passwords – a “blacklist” of shared choices.

And while it can be useful to offer guidance for users at the point of password creation, sites should stop insisting on things that authoritative organisations like the UK National Cyber Security Centre and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology now say ought not to be enforced. For example, they advise against the requirement for password complexity (like including upper and lower case letters, numbers and punctuation signs).

Both organisations indicate that increasing password length is more important than complexity. This is because longer passwords are more resistant to brute force cracking (where attackers try all letter, number and symbol combinations to find a match) and less complicate passwords can be easier to remember.

in addition many sites continue to need complexity and impose upper limits on length, in the time of action often blocking perfectly reasonable password choices that our browsers and other tools can automatically generate for us.

ineffective passwords leave many people unprotected to hackers.

You may surprise why this is important. If people want to choose ineffective passwords and put themselves at risk, then why should that become the provider’s problem? One argument is that if a service is charged with protecting users’ personal data (as providers are by GDPR) then it doesn’t make a lot of sense to allow users to leave themselves unprotected by choosing ineffective passwords.

It’s also worth noting that in some situations one user’s ineffective password could give an attacker a foothold into the system from which to adventure other weaknesses and increase their access. So it’s arguably in the provider’s interest to minimise these opportunities and protect other people’s data in the time of action.

Read more:
Four ways to make sure your passwords are safe and easy to remember

Passwords aren’t going anywhere

We’re now seeing a move towards passwordless authentication, but this name in itself emphasises the dominance of password-based methods. Their death was expected more than 15 years ago, and in addition they’re nevertheless here. It’s safe to assume they’re going to be with us for some time in addition.

So we have a choice: take collective responsibility to get the basics right – which involves action by users and providers – or continue the collective effort to shrug our shoulders and complain about users’ behaviour.

For those providing and operating password-based systems, sites and sets, the call to action is hopefully clear: check what your site permits and see if it should do better. If it lets ineffective passwords pass, then either change this, or at a minimum do something that tries to deter users from choosing them.

If you are reading this as a user and you’re looking for some good advice on creating better passwords, the UK National Cyber Security Centre provides some useful tips. These include combining three random words to give yourself longer but more noticable passwords, and saving your passwords securely in your browser to further reduce the burden of remembering passwords across multiple sites. So already if providers are not doing enough, there are nevertheless some things you can do to protect yourself.

Click: See details

Leave a Reply